redzilla
All tools
Optical fiber

Fiber Latency

Convert the distance of a fiber run into propagation delay: one-way and round-trip (RTT) in µs and ms. Light in fiber travels at c/n (≈4.90 µs/km in single-mode), slower than in vacuum. Everything in your browser.

End-to-end length of the fiber run, in kilometers.

The group index of the fiber. Typical single-mode ~1.4682. The speed of light drops to c/n.

Examples
redzilla.cl — latencia-fibra
 
One-way delay
Round-trip (RTT)
Propagation velocity
one-way
RTT
µs/km

The delay in all units

Magnitudeone-wayround-trip

Fiber vs vacuum (radio / line of sight)

Mediumnµs/kmone-way

In vacuum light travels at c (≈3.336 µs/km); in fiber it drops to c/n. The penalty is the factor n.

How it is calculated · speed of light and index

1. In vacuum light travels at c = 299,792.458 km/s, that is ≈3.336 µs/km (1e6 / c).

2. In a medium with refractive index n the velocity drops to v = c / n. Single-mode fiber has n ≈ 1.4682.

3. One-way delay: t = distance · n / c. In µs: distance · n / c · 1e6 ≈ 4.90 µs/km for n = 1.4682.

4. The round-trip (RTT) is there and back: RTT = 2 · one-way. It is the link's minimum physical latency; it does not include processing, queuing or serialization.

Runs locally in your browser · no sign-up · nothing leaves your browser.

How it works

The calculator converts the distance of a fiber optic span into its propagation delay: the physical minimum time light needs to traverse the link, one-way and round-trip (RTT), expressed in µs and ms. It also shows the resulting propagation speed and a comparison against vacuum (radio or line of sight).

The physics is straightforward: in vacuum light travels at c = 299,792.458 km/s (≈3.336 µs/km), but inside glass it slows to v = c ÷ n, where n is the group refractive index. For typical single-mode fiber n ≈ 1.4682, which yields the classic rule of ≈4.90 µs per kilometer one-way; RTT is twice that. You can pick single-mode, multimode (n≈1.48), air, vacuum or a custom index. This delay excludes processing, queuing and serialization: it is the floor no optimization can lower.

Example: how much latency do 100 km of single-mode fiber add?

  1. One-way: 100 × 1.4682 ÷ 299,792.458 × 10^6 ≈ 489.7 µs, that is ≈0.49 ms.
  2. RTT (what a ping would see, propagation only): 2 × 489.7 ≈ 979.5 µs ≈ 0.98 ms.
  3. Comparison: in vacuum the same path would take 100 × 3.336 = 333.6 µs; fiber pays a penalty factor of n ≈ 1.47.

Frequently asked questions

How many milliseconds of latency does 1 km of fiber add?
About 0.0049 ms (4.90 µs) per kilometer one-way, with single-mode fiber at n ≈ 1.4682. The quick rule is 1 ms one-way per ~204 km of fiber, or 1 ms of RTT per ~102 km.
Why is my ping higher than what the calculator shows?
Because the tool computes only the propagation delay, the physical floor of the link. A real ping adds serialization, queuing in routers and switches, per-hop processing and the fact that the fiber route is rarely the straight line between endpoints. If your measured RTT is much higher than the physical one, the excess lives in the network, not in the glass.
Does light not travel at the speed of light inside fiber?
It travels at c divided by the refractive index of the glass: about 204,000 km/s in single-mode, roughly 68 % of the speed in vacuum. That is why microwave links or LEO satellites can beat fiber on latency over long routes, even though fiber wins on capacity and reliability.
What is the difference between one-way delay and RTT?
One-way is the outbound time; RTT (round-trip time) is out and back, exactly double on a symmetric link. Tools like ping measure RTT, while voice latency budgets (ITU-T G.114) and many SLAs are stated as one-way delay: be careful not to mix them up.
Was this tool useful?
Disclaimer We take great care to keep every tool accurate and review it thoroughly; even so, we can't guarantee it is free of errors or take responsibility for how the results are used. We recommend double-checking anything critical.
Found an error? Let us know →