redzilla
All tools
Cabling

Cabling Channel (TIA-568)

Check whether a copper run meets the TIA-568 channel model: a permanent (horizontal) link of up to 90 m plus patch cords, for a total channel of up to 100 m. The real limit depends on category and speed. 100% in your browser.

Fixed run from the rack to the outlet. Maximum 90 m.

Cords at both ends (rack + device). Typically 10 m total.

The channel limit changes with category and speed (10G on Cat6 drops to 55 m).

Examples
redzilla.cl — tia568
 
Channel used

Total channel
horizontal + patch cords
Applicable limit
Remaining margin
limit − channel
Verdict
Channel
Limit
Margin

Channel limit (m) by category × speed

Category1G2.5G5G10G

= unsupported · the active cell is highlighted.

How it is calculated · the TIA-568 channel model

1. The permanent link is the fixed horizontal run (rack → outlet): maximum 90 m.

2. The channel is the permanent link plus the patch cords at both ends: channel = horizontal + patch, with a reference maximum of 100 m.

3. The real limit depends on category and speed. E.g.: Cat6 supports 10G only up to 55 m; Cat6A reaches 100 m at 10G; Cat5e supports neither 5G nor 10G.

4. Verdict: pass if horizontal ≤ 90 m and channel ≤ limit; unsupported if that category cannot run the speed; exceeds if the channel is over the applicable limit.

5. The real limit also depends on cable quality, connectors, temperature and alien crosstalk (interference between adjacent cables). Certify the link to confirm.

Runs locally in your browser · no sign-up · nothing leaves your browser.

How it works

The tool checks whether a copper run complies with the ANSI/TIA-568 channel model: it adds the horizontal length (permanent link, maximum 90 m) and the patch cords at both ends to get the total channel (channel = horizontal + patch), then compares it against the applicable limit for the cable category (Cat5e, Cat6, Cat6A or Cat7) and the target speed (1G, 2.5G, 5G or 10G per IEEE 802.3).

The limit is not always 100 m: the category × speed matrix reflects the real cases, for example Cat6 supports 10GBASE-T only up to 55 m, and Cat5e does not support 5G or 10G at any distance. With that data it reports the remaining margin (limit − channel) and a verdict: compliant, exceeded (horizontal over 90 m or channel over the limit) or not supported.

Example: does a 50 m Cat6 run work for 10G?

  1. Horizontal 50 m + patch cords 5 m = 55 m channel.
  2. The Cat6 limit at 10GBASE-T is not 100 m but 55 m (category × speed table).
  3. Margin: 55 − 55 = 0 m. Verdict: compliant, but right at the limit; one extra meter would push it out of spec.

Frequently asked questions

What is the maximum distance for a Cat6 network cable?
For 1G, 2.5G and 5G the full channel can reach 100 m (90 m of fixed cabling plus 10 m of patch cords). For 10GBASE-T the Cat6 limit drops to roughly 55 m; if you need 10G at 100 m, Cat6A is the right choice.
What is the difference between permanent link and channel?
The permanent link is the fixed run between the patch panel and the wall outlet, limited to 90 m; it is what gets certified at installation time. The channel adds the patch cords at both ends (rack and device) and is what the network card actually sees, with a 100 m reference cap.
What happens if the cable exceeds 100 meters?
The link may still work, but out of spec: attenuation and delay exceed what the standard guarantees, and you typically see CRC errors, renegotiation to lower speeds or intermittent drops. The usual fix is to insert a switch or run fiber for that segment.
Does Cat5e work for 2.5G or 5G?
Cat5e supports 2.5GBASE-T up to 100 m in most installations in good condition, and the tool matrix reflects that. 5G and 10G are not supported: those speeds require Cat6 (5G at 100 m, 10G up to 55 m) or Cat6A. In every case it is worth certifying the link, since connector quality and alien crosstalk also matter.
Was this tool useful?
Disclaimer We take great care to keep every tool accurate and review it thoroughly; even so, we can't guarantee it is free of errors or take responsibility for how the results are used. We recommend double-checking anything critical.
Found an error? Let us know →